Skip to main content

Reading Profile




When it comes to my reading preferences, I have always been one to lean towards the typical happy ending. Growing up I was always reading about anything magical, fairy tale, talking animals, anything that brought me out of reality basically. I guess that's what books do right?! So, let me start off with some of my favorite genres I typically reach for: romance, fantasy, historical fiction, biographies (depending on the person is only way I'll pick it up). I also love mythology especially Greek and Celtic, and I'm rediscovering my love of manga. Although some people would argue this is not book, but I disagree. However, one of my all-time favorite reads is fairy tale adaptations especially of Beauty and the Beast. 

Authors can be a hit and miss for me, as an example Stephanie Meyer's books are well written and can keep a reader interested. However, I am not a fan of her work in general and that could be because I have grown out of teen vampire romance phase (well maybe not). One of my favorite authors is Diana Gabaldon, her writing of stories and going in depth with characterizations are amazing. However, her books are so thick it can bog down a reader which is why I had to take a break from her books.  I never realized that there are types of readers. As the RA Interview training video depicts, I would say most of the patron I have interactions on a daily basis are type B or C. 

Sicard (2020) describes these readers as either medium to low interaction from staff or have specific amount of time to read. I would say as a reader I tend to be Type B. I generally do not have a lot of time to read, and when looking for my next read I like to hear what staff would suggest. One thing as a reader I know I value, is the opportunity to come back if I didn't enjoy the suggestion made to me. Sicard (2020) also uses components from a reference interview standpoint to help with finding what a person wants. I will say I turned to NoveList and Goodreads quite often now since I started working at my library. It makes both my professional and personal reading inquires more insightful but also fun. 

I'll end this with a list of my favorite series, authors, etc. . . Also, I am open to new suggestions anytime.

Series:                                                            Authors:

Court of Thorn and Roses                             Agatha Christie 

From Blood and Ash                                     Sarah J Maas

Vampire Academy                                         Jennifer L. Armentrout 

Outlander                                                       Ruta Sepetys 

                                                                       Ali Hazelwood 

References 

Sicard, R. [Rachel Sicard]. (2020, May 21). Readers' advisory interview training [Video].    YouTube. Readers' Advisory Interview Training - YouTube 



Comments

  1. Lexi OwensJanuary 20, 2023 at 4:09 PM

    Hi Bre,

    From your reading profile, it seems we have opposite tastes in literature. I do not read manga because it does not captivate my interest, but I would still classify it as a book. Is the reason why some consider manga is not a book because of the difference between the number of graphics compared to the number of words, or is there another reason for which I am unaware? Although I also choose books that take me away from reality, particularly during challenging situations and times, I nevertheless gravitate toward realistic fiction, which is my genre of choice, because, for me, realistic fiction still takes me out of my reality and places me in another. I was also surprised to find out that there were classifications for different types of readers and library users. I would categorize myself as a type C, specifically during breaks or the summer months when I am not taking classes. In general, I prefer to search on my own for books, without staff assistance, not because I do not value their opinions or expertise, but because I have social anxiety, and my coping mechanism is to tend to avoid these types of interactions altogether. I would categorize most patrons with whom I interact, as a type D. I do not have a lot of experience with Goodreads or Novelist. However, the times I have utilized them for book recommendations for myself, for class, or at work, I have found both resources useful. I have not heard of Diana Gabaldon, but in acknowledging that her book lengths can be challenging, you, perhaps unintentionally, make an important point: even library staff and avid readers can become burnt out by reading. Reading your comment about the length of Gabaldon’s books also made me consider how we, as a society, discuss our ‘favorite’ of something. Perhaps I am in the minority with this thought. However, in our society it feels as though when someone attaches the word ‘favorite’ to something, the assumption is that that person cannot then critique an aspect of their favorite thing, that their enjoyment is all-or-nothing. Therefore, I appreciate that you still consider Gabaldon one of your favorite authors but can also acknowledge some challenging elements of her work.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Week Six Prompt

    I think one thing to do to promote Romance, is something like "Love at First Line" this is also maybe called "Blind Date with a Book". At my library we have done the Blind Date Books, which not everyone was in to, but those who were had a great time with the activity. However, this would only promote romance books. Having likes and dislikes in Romance would be on a card and filled out and then once the book is picked it is wrapped up in solid colored paper with the first line of the book or summary on it. Then the patron enjoys their "Date"/"Love".  The descriptors would be leveled as mild, medium, spicy or el diablo hot, and then go into subgenres section like historical, science fiction, and other areas. This would also give opportunity for audiobooks, ebooks and other forms to be utilized as well. 
1 comment
Read more

Week Seven Prompt

  *Disclaimer, this post may get very passionate at various times. A soap box might be required. When it comes to books in general, as a librarian I take appreciation for all books. Now that is appreciation which is defined as "recognition and enjoyment of the good qualities of someone or something" (Webster Dictionary, 2023). With that being said, does this mean I think every book in my library is something enjoyable? For me as an individual that is an obvious no, but for someone else there is a different stance on some books. As an example, I cannot stand  Fifty Shades of Grey due to the fact that when it comes to relationships and romance books, this did not appeal to me in the least. Plus, the writing style is not what I would consider to be of merit (as a writer, but that's just me). However, there are many in my work and personal circle who love this book. My point is this, we all have different views of book titles and authors and guess what. . . .THAT IS OKAY! No...
1 comment
Read more